(Wherin the scribe loses his way before briefly capturing elusive glory)
Camera action!
Let it begin.
Quest for mighty dragon,
slay with counterintuitive
explanatory process, yo
check the signifcance,
no matter how significant
assert the discriminant variance,
claim substantiveness and jet
to your mean profile, lest
you get stuck in your identity matrix,
cause your log odds gonna get rolled
into the pork barrel, today kid,
district bottom line bid shallow,
hallowed convention hid shallow,
dismayed did you check your influence
kid knew that leveraged stat, who dat
took off his hat to variable that
affected effect on the ambiguous chance at...what?!?!?
Oct 31, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 sucka ass fools had something to say:
In 1994, if you had told me that in 6 years ED would be a music aficionado with a bunch of hippie friends I would have put 100-1 odds against it.
In 2000, if you had told me ED would be a PHD candidate in academia I would have put 50-1 odds against it.
In 2003, if you had told me ED would be blogging mathy song lyrics because of his leaking interest in statistics, I would have put 20-1 odds against it.
Lankownia is slowely learning that trying to peg ED's interests is not a good idea. Even odds on anything from here on out.
In 1978, if you had told me the class, race, and parental education levels, I could have told you that the subject would likely go for an advanced degree or two.
My interest in you remains constant.
Post a Comment